# Takumi Assessment Reports Now Rate Findings in More Detail

Takumi assessment reports now rate every finding on three scales.

Alongside the severity they already carried, findings now show the **attack possibility** and the **urgency** derived from the two, so a report tells you not only how serious a finding is but which one to address first.

## Overview

Severity measures how much damage results once an attack succeeds, and says nothing about whether that attack is realistically achievable. As a result, a critical finding that depends on preconditions no ordinary attacker can meet used to sit alongside a critical finding anyone can reproduce.

The newly added [attack possibility](/docs/t/assessment/references/possibility) rates that missing half — whether the attack can realistically be pulled off — on a scale from High down to Impossible. [Urgency](/docs/t/assessment/references/urgency) then follows from the combination of severity and attack possibility. It is not judged on its own, so read it when deciding which findings to fix first.

The report's overall A-E rating now follows the highest urgency among the findings it contains, and the findings list is ordered by urgency, so you can work through the report from the top.

Note that the new criteria apply only to reports from assessments started from now on. Findings reported by past assessments are unchanged.

Some reports may also show "—" as the attack possibility and urgency of a finding. An assessment that started before the attack possibility became available can still carry findings that were never rated on it, and without that scale no urgency follows either. Those findings are listed after the rated ones and are not reflected in the report's overall rating, so judge them by their severity and by what the finding says.

▼ User Guide: [Severity](/docs/t/assessment/references/severity), [Attack Possibility](/docs/t/assessment/references/possibility), [Urgency](/docs/t/assessment/references/urgency)